The Furious Angels

FA Discussion => Off Topic => Topic started by: Jeyk on December 14, 2005, 10:23:29 pm

Title: King Kong
Post by: Jeyk on December 14, 2005, 10:23:29 pm
Good flick.  There were quite a few sappy, as Joaquin would say, "monkey love" scenes, but it made up for it in action.
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2005, 10:39:05 pm
Hopefully I can find someone to go see it with tomorrow. I have to get in and see this movie in theatres, for sure
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2005, 11:23:31 pm
w00t!
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2005, 07:12:12 am
very long, but we all know how much peter jackson loves to make 3-hour-long + movies :)

and yeah, it pretty much rocked. then we got pancakes at ihop. and i wish i found $20 :p
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Manic Velocity on December 15, 2005, 10:42:08 am
Ew... monkey love.

As much as I hate the "remake" and "book-to-movie adaptation" roads that Hollywood seems to be going down lately, the hype around Kong has gotten to me.  I might have to go see it this weekend.
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2005, 03:15:31 pm
Monkey love?  She screws the ape?  I don't wish to know.

Monkey things never did it for me.  I am watching The Exorcism Of Emily Rose this weekend though, a good Christmas film
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Kosila on December 17, 2005, 02:44:39 am
WOW! ...

Amazing ... wow ...
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 17, 2005, 04:09:40 pm
Teh kong-ness.

Quote

then we got pancakes at ihop. and I wish I found $20


Who doesnt wish they found $20?...  I wish I found more :p
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Tbone on December 17, 2005, 05:10:53 pm
I posted in this thread. What happened to it?

Movie was too cheesy. Narnia's CGI was better. Everyone's bones were made of titanium (especially the fragile girl being swung around by King Kong every other second). There was no consistancy with time (daylight one minute, night time the next with no passage of time). Lots of plot holes. The movie was just...sloppy.
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Jeyk on December 17, 2005, 09:58:49 pm
*Throws a spear at Tbone*
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 18, 2005, 12:27:03 pm
it's weird considering that the effects were both done by the same people
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Avzeke (Khr0n1k) on December 18, 2005, 12:28:13 pm
not really maybe kong didnt have as big of a budget or somthing. Or they got lazy
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 18, 2005, 12:29:28 pm
I thought it was an awesome movie.
Title: King Kong
Post by: Kosila on December 18, 2005, 04:19:18 pm
Quote from: "Orien"
I thought it was an awesome movie.


Agreed!

Yes, the graphics sucked at some points (integrating the girl into the background), BUT WHO CARES! :p Did you not see the T-Rex fight scene?! Did you not see what happened to the T-Rex?! :p People literally jumped out of their seats!

Quote from: "Tbone"
Everyone's bones were made of titanium


Isn't everyone's bones made out of titanium in every movie? :p
Title: Re: King Kong
Post by: Anonymous on December 18, 2005, 05:57:40 pm
yeah it's pretty hard to have an all cgi character holding a human thru a whole movie, pretty new to me
SimplePortal 2.3.8 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal